European Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

nvis March 3, 2020 0 Comments

Europea<span id="more-6508"></span>n Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE the other day that EU-wide online gambling legislation would maybe not occur in his life time ‘or the next.’

The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the concept of a pan-European framework that is regulatory online gambling, accepting that individual member states mainly oppose synchronizing their Internet video gaming laws. The move interestingly mirrors similar problems in the US, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have grown to be a battle that is ongoing the iGaming wars.

Speaking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC wasn’t taking care of sector-specific legislation in gambling.

‘The Commission is not proposing it and will maybe not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my life time or the following.’

Temmink leads the gambling team product and chairs the EC’s Professional Group on Gambling Services.

It is a far cry from the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed a framework that is eu-wide to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of recreations.

EU Action Plan

Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and technical [online gambling] issues in the EU’ could never be ‘tackled adequately by member states individually.’

‘This is very true given the cross-border dimension of on line gambling,’ he said in 2012, when it had been established that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to clarify the regulation regarding the sector and encourage cooperation between member states.

The EC frowned in the regulatory actions that had been taken in France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a high rate, in apparent conflict with EU ideals of free movement of services between member states.

Barnier’s plan had beenn’t proposing an individual EU licensing regime, but alternatively had the goal of ensuring that member states adopted its eyesight for an even more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. Member states that refused to play ball would be sanctioned, then in Barnier’s vision.

But Barnier left the post in 2014, and their successor, Günther Oettinger, appears less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to making legislation to individual jurisdictions.

More Fragmented than Ever

As Temmink explained, ‘I can assure you that if we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first meeting with the Council, we would have 26 out of 28 member states that could be fiercely opposed to the proposal.

‘It could be committing suicide,’ he added.

Since Barnier outlined his plan in 2012, a wave of brand new legislation has spread across Europe, and numerous licensing that is new have sprung up, through the UK to Portugal. Europe has become even less coordinated regarding the front that is iGaming as well as the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.

‘Operators need to really have a license for the particular country in which they offer games, without being able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part 888 casino es fiable is for the Member States to ensure a non-discriminatory system of issuing licenses.’

Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Would Be Key

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as numerous Nevada voters as you possibly can prior to the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what’s shaping up to be a make-or-break point within the campaign that is democratic. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)

Nevada voters are the center of attention for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns right now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees attempt to persuade as many last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February caucus that is 23rd.

After Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed closely by a hefty defeat in brand new Hampshire, the Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum. She once held a lead that is nearly 50-point her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with many analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.

Clinton and Sanders each invested the weekend making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las Vegas on Sunday, while his opponent met with voters in many locations around the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.

The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday at the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation mainly made up of African-Americans.

‘Whenever we can win here in Nevada, we send a profound message to the entire country, and that message is that the individuals of this country will no longer accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks.

Clinton responded to Sanders with line as vague as Bernie’s plan of exactly how he will fund his utopian eyesight.

‘I am not a single issue prospect,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because whenever we were going to attain everything about banking institutions and cash and politics, would that end racism?’

Say what now?

Nevada Key State in Runoff

When Sanders officially announced his decision to perform for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was already likely to work in Nevada. Volunteers had been making hundreds of daily calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.

The Vermont senator didn’t have much of a chance, at least according to pundits that are political.

Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an occasion in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each phase, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.

Nevada has a long history of being fully a swing state within the general presidential election, and its constituents have an almost perfect record of voting for the winner that is eventual. Since 1912, Nevada has correctly selected the next president, except for in 1976, whenever Nevada visited Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.

A win in Nevada for Clinton is anticipated, while a win for Sanders pull off exactly what would perhaps be the biggest political upset in modern history.

Neck-in-Neck towards the Finish

Nevada hosts the gambling epicenter of the United States, therefore perhaps it’s appropriate that there is small evidence that is statistical run using in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.

The stark reality is that wagering on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to betting on red or black colored. The most recent poll from TargetPoint, initial governmental data on the competition since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.

Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot

Including to your intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent natural reasons at the chronilogical age of 79. Appointed towards the bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the highest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.

A bunch of names have already been tossed around, including Nevada that is current Governor Sandoval (R). A welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him seem unlikely for an Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage.

Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties

Michonne Ascuaga, that has resigned from the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a home she previously managed with her family, the Sparks Nugget in north Nevada, is being examined for lax anti-money controls that are laundering. (Image: ktvn.com)

Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post in the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of alleged improprieties that are financial the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she managed for 16 years.

The Nugget has been examined by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations so it neglected to comply with financial regulations during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to establish an effective anti-money laundering program.

The investigation found light in a court filing last week, as part of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family against the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment group that bought the home in 2013.

Sandoval Unaware of Investigation

A spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval was unaware associated with the research whenever he appointed Ascuaga to your Gaming Commission panel last April.

‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ published Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘we admire her and desire to recognize her family’s long history as leaders within the video gaming industry.

‘I appreciate that she’s put the credibility and reputation of the Gaming Commission first,’ he added. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will still be a leader in our community.’

Ascuaga has claimed in a statement that is official she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’

‘The Sparks Nugget had been informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department ended up being investigating whether it was appropriate to impose civil charges for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations,’ she added. ‘The matter arose from an audit-type examination carried out by the IRS at the casino this year. This is all disclosed immediately towards the buyer.’

Ascuaga Lawsuit

It is alleged that the Nugget will be investigated for laxity in its record-keeping and reporting requirements. By legislation, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all deals over $10,000, and report any activity that is suspicious FinCEN, as an easy method of guarding against money-laundering.

Ascuaga is the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of the Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga family members believes it is still owed $500,000 underneath the sale and purchase agreement of the Nugget.

Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission and to not allow myself to become a distraction that is unnecessary the important regulatory oversight work it does.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *